This is part 2 (of 4) of a informal article written for the LAWASIA conference in Kuala Lumpur, 2008 (amended for context). Its a quick snapshot of the different types of Online Legal Research resources that are available in the Malaysian and Singaporean legal landscape.
Free Online Resources
Search Engines
The ubiquitous search engine is the first choice in any basic trawl for information. Search engines are able to give a snapshot of relevant sites, news, general details and principles. However, to get effective results, the technical limits of the search engine that is being used must be understood, as well as the context of the terms that are being searched for and also how the ranking and grouping of results takes place. For example, a search engine may not compile information or types of content from relevant jurisdictions or key sources, or may incorrectly give a low relevancy rank to a relevant website thereby relegating it to the third or fourth page. The user may never have the opportunity to access a relevant site, unless they are doggedly determined. Google has become synonymous with search engines, and with good reason. Its complicated algorithms and page rank analysis allow it to consistently display relevant and real results. Google was an internet leader in identifying the different silos and types of information online and making it easy for the user to sift through the type of content they wished to find. As such, Google has fostered a growing suite of specific services.One service is Google Books, which is a tool that searches the full text of books that have been scanned and stored in its digital database. A preview or snippet of the book is displayed based on the keywords the user has searched.
Besides Google, there are many other types of search engines which can cater more specifically to a user’s needs. Rednano.sg is a good case study. Red Nano searches over web content, and also the archives of The Straits Times (a leading Singapore newspaper) which are not accessible to other search engines. Immediately, the Singapore user is privy to search results that are more likely to be relevant. In addition, the results that are displayed are grouped firstly into findings from Singapore sources, and then into results gathered from the rest of the world. Another type of search is provided by Technorati.com which searches blogs and the other forms of independent, user-generated content (videos, photos etc) known as “citizen media”.
Article to be continued
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=03a94911-885f-4e41-9e0c-ea6560991824)


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ddefb10b-86dd-4a28-a490-e2ba58ca7dbd)


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ecc5bd8e-c026-4cdc-9fef-87f74b6cbd88)
Worm in the Apple iPad
Despite the iPad not yet being officially released in our little ‘pore yet, apparently Singaporeans are one of the most iPad-crazy countries in the world, judging by data from auction website eBay. (see here)
Apple said that it will release the iPad in July for another nine markets, including Singapore, however, after much fanfare, to tell you the truth (though I still love the iPhone) Im getting sick of the whole Apple = gawd routine.
Lets check in on the grass roots indicator on iPad:
Technometry friend who has played with the Ipad says: no expandable storage, no go.
Work colleague who has also got her hands on them says; just like a big iphone, – can play Angry Birds on bigger screen, but thats about it
Did a search on features that suck on the iphone, and all that came up were marketing articles that touted that the iphone was actually the best thing since sliced bread.
Till I play with one, I gonna be very skeptical, just like I am about the whole Apple 4g lost phone scenario.
→ Leave a comment
Posted in Commentary
Tagged Add new tag, Apple, EBay, Handhelds, Ipad, iPhone, Singapore, Smartphones, Website